Online Colloquium (2): Lechner on Leviathan on a Leash
Silviya Lechner comments on Leviathan on a Leash, in the second entry to this online colloquium.
Author Archive for: admin
Entries by admin
Online Colloquium (1): Introduction to Leviathan on a Leash
Sean Fleming introduces his recent book, Leviathan on a Leash, to begin this online colloquium.
Online Colloquium (5): Reply to Critics by Silviya Lechner
Silviya Lechner concludes our online colloquium on Hobbesian Internationalism with a reply to her critics.
Online Colloquium (4): Oliver Eberl on Hobbesian Internationalism
Oliver Eberl comments on Hobbesian Internationalism, in the penultimate entry to this online colloquium.
Online Colloquium (3): Chiayu Chou on Hobbesian Internationalism
Chiayu Chou comments on Hobbesian Internationalism, in the third entry to this online colloquium.
Online Colloquium (2): Korab-Karpowicz on Hobbesian Internationalism
W. Julian Korab-Karpowicz comments on Hobbesian Internationalism, in the second entry to this online colloquium.
Online Colloquium (1): Introduction to Hobbesian Internationalism
Silviya Lechner introduces her recent book, Hobbesian Internationalism, to begin this online colloquium.
New article: ‘Hobbes’s genealogy of private conscience’, by Guido Frilli
In this new article, Guido Frilli reconstructs Hobbes’s critique of the language of private conscience and shows how it subverts the traditional moral-theological notion of private judgement.
New article: ‘Il concetto di status naturae tra Hobbes e Kant’, by Gianluca Sadun Bordoni
In this new article, Gianluca Sadun Bordoni explores Kant’s engagement with Hobbes’s conception of the state of nature and shows how Kant radicalises the idea by adding an ‘ethical’ state of nature to Hobbes’s ‘juridical’ conception.
New article: ‘Real Unity and Representation in Hobbes, Schmitt, and Barth’, by Sarita Zaffini
In this new article, Sarita Zaffini argues that Hobbes invoked a theological notion of representation alongside the more familiar idea of legal authorization. The article draws on Karl Barth to explain this form of representation, while supporting Carl Schmitt’s view of the continued significance of theological representation for modern politics.
Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
